Salt
of
the Empire.
.
The Role of the Christian
Family in Evangelization
.
by Mike Aquilina
Years ago, I came across
a children’s book that told the history of the
early Church in small words and in
large, brightly colored pictures. The first
few centuries were pretty much distilled into
a few pages with a simple message, which I’ll
summarize here:
The wicked Roman Empire
prevailed for a long time, killing Christians
by the thousands, till one day the pagan
emperor Constantine was crossing a bridge. He
looked up into the sky and saw a cross in the
clouds and he heard a voice saying, “By this
sign, you shall conquer.” So Constantine
became a believer, and from that moment on the
Roman Empire was a Christian Empire. The End.
If only evangelization
were that simple. If only God would always
make the gospel immediately relevant by
raising a huge cross in the sky and thundering
a command from above. If only he would
transform our culture by the miraculous
conversion of its most influential leaders,
starting with the emperors of politics and
culture.
The truth, however, is
that the Christianizing of the Roman Empire
after Constantine was a messy affair – perhaps
messier than it had been before, during the
almost three centuries of persecution. The
Eastern and Western lands went about the work
of Christianizing in radically different ways;
nasty disputes arose over the relationship
between throne and altar; a rift appeared
between East and West, which would eventually
leave the Eastern peoples vulnerable to the
rise of Islam and ultimately widen into a
schism that tragically split the Church in
two.
So much for the storybook
ending of a Christian empire. Yet the truth
about the early Christians is more exciting,
more instructive, and even more miraculous
than the storybooks convey. It is a story not
so much about emperors and armies as about
families and how they changed the world.
Astonishing Growth
The truth is that, by the
time Constantine legalized the practice of
Christianity in 313, the empire was already
heavily Christianized. By the year 300 perhaps
10 percent of the people were Christians, and
by the middle of the century, Christians may
well have been a majority of the citizens, 33
million Christians in an empire of 60 million
people. So Constantine did not so much ensure
Christianity’s success as acknowledge it. His
edict of toleration was overdue recognition
that the Church had already won the empire. We
were already in the majority.
These were not 33 million
“nominal” Christians – not 33 million
“cafeteria Catholics” and “chaplain to the
culture” Protestants. They could not be. They
did not have the luxury of being lukewarm. In
the decade before Constantine’s edict, the
Church had suffered its most ruthless and
systematic persecution ever under the emperor
Diocletian and his successors. The practice of
the faith was, in many places, punished by
torture and death. In many places, to live as
a Christian meant, at the least, to accept
social stigma and humiliation. What is more,
the Christian way itself was characterized by
demanding disciplines in the life of prayer
and in the moral life.
To be a Christian was not
easy in the year 300. It cost something.
Whether or not you were martyred, you had to
pay with your life. Christians were laying
their lives on the line every time they
attended the liturgy, and they continued to do
so through the course of every day.
Yet the rate of
conversion throughout the empire – beginning
with the first Christians, long before
Constantine – was most remarkable. A few years
ago, an eminent sociologist, Rodney Stark of
the University of Washington, set out to track
church growth in the ancient world. He
gathered his findings in The Rise of
Christianity. Dr. Stark is not a Christian and
had no vested interest in making Christianity
look good.
What Stark found in his
study of the first Christian centuries was an
astonishing growth rate of 40 percent per
decade. Again, Constantine gets no credit for
this growth. Most of it happened in the years
before he was born. In fact, even though
conversions were coerced at various times
after the year 380, the Church never again
witnessed the kind of growth that took place
when conversions were costly.
Stark holds that most growth
came from individual conversions, and not only
from the poor, but also from the merchant and
upper classes. He argues that most converts were
women, that women benefited greatly from
conversion, and that some women – though never
ordained to the priesthood – were influential
leaders. Using historical data and sociological
methods, he argues that the Christian population
grew by 40 percent a decade, from about 1,000
Christians in the year 40 to 7,530 in 100 to a
little over six million in 300 and 33 million in
350 – growing, in the hundred years between 250
and 350, from about two percent of the
population to slightly over half.
Misery and Fewer Girls
Stark vividly describes
the misery of ordinary citizens in the cities
of the pagan world. All but the rich lived in
cramped, smoky tenements – one family to a
small room, with no ventilation or plumbing –
which frequently collapsed or burned. The
cities were horribly crowded, a city like
Antioch having perhaps 200 people per acre,
plus livestock (modern Calcutta has only 122
people per acre). Constant immigration meant
that the cities were peopled by strangers,
with the resulting crime and disorder, so that
the streets were not safe at night and
families were not even safe in their homes.
Human waste was thrown
into open ditches in the middle of the narrow
streets, and the cities were smothered in
flies attracted by the filth. The corpses of
those who died of natural causes were
sometimes left to rot in the city’s open
sewers. (“The stench of these cities must have
been overpowering for many miles – especially
in warm weather,” Stark noted.) Water was hard
to get and almost always foul.
Life expectancy was at
most around 30 for men and perhaps much lower
for women. Hygiene was minimal. Medical care
was more dangerous than disease – and disease
often disfigured its victims when it did not
kill them. The human body was host to
countless parasites, and tenements were
infested by vermin. For entertainment, people
thronged to the circuses to see other people
mutilated and killed.
And pagan marriage
offered no respite from this misery.
Greco-Roman women were usually married off at
age 11 or 12, to a mate not of their choosing,
who was often much older (Christian girls
tended to marry at about 18). Afterward, they
suffered in predatory relationships rife with
contraception, abortion (which often killed
the mother), adultery, and unnatural sexual
acts.
Infanticide was common,
especially for female or defective offspring.
Of the 600 families who show up in the records
from ancient Delphi, only six raised more than
one daughter. Though most of those 600
families were quite large, they had all
routinely killed their baby girls. Stark
quotes a letter from a pagan businessman
writing home to his pregnant wife. After the
usual endearments, he closes his letter by
saying, briefly and casually, “If you are
delivered of a child [before I come home], if
it is a boy, keep it, if a girl, discard it.”
If fewer girls lived to
see the second day from their birth, still
more died on their way to adulthood. The
shortage of women, then, played further havoc
on the population growth of the empire, as
well as its economy and its morals. Homosexual
activity was considered normal for married
men.
Attractive Homes
That is the world in which
the first Christians were born, in which they
grew up and married, and in which they raised
their families. You might call it a culture of
death.
But Christian marriage
and childrearing immediately set Christians
apart. According to Stark, Christian husbands
and wives genuinely tried to love one another,
as their religion required. Their mutual
affection and their openness to fertility led
to a higher birthrate, and thus to a still
higher growth rate for the early Church. They
did not abort their children, nor did husbands
endanger their wives’ lives by doing so.
The early Christians’
respect for the dignity of marriage made the
faith enormously attractive to pagan women. So
women made up a disproportionate number of the
early converts. This in turn made Christianity
enormously attractive to pagan men – who could
not find many pagan women to marry, but saw
young ladies attending the Christian liturgy
in great numbers.
We should not dismiss
these benefits of Christianity in the natural
order. One thing that the rise of Christianity
demonstrated is that faithfulness to the one
true God is the best way to happiness, not
only in heaven, but also in the world that God
created. Christian faith, then as now, makes
for happy homes. And, in pagan cultures, then
as now, happy homes are very attractive. The
evidence seems to indicate that, in the Roman
Empire, Christian homes provided the Church’s
primary place of evangelization. And that the
Church grew because in every place it lived as
a family.
This is something we do
not find too often in the published lives of
the saints, which tend to focus primarily on
extraordinary events and great miracles. Nor
do we find this story told in ecclesiastical
histories, which tend to focus almost
exclusively on the lives of the bishops and
the clergy. Yet it is the true story of the
Church. As St. Augustine put it, the story of
the growth of the gospel was the story of “one
heart setting another on fire.”
The fire of charity
tended in the Christian home soon consumed
city blocks and then neighborhoods. It was not
the sort of ecstatic experience we see in the
account of the first Pentecost in the Acts of
the Apostles. It was, rather, quiet and
gradual. Let us look at just one example of
how this fire of charity burned.
Epidemics were among the
great terrors of life in the ancient world. The
physicians in those days knew that the diseases
were communicable, but they knew nothing about
bacteria or viruses, never mind antibiotics or
antisepsis. Once the diseases hit your hometown,
there was really no stopping them. Several major
epidemics ravaged the empire during the rise of
Christianity, and each of them reduced the
empire’s population by about one-third.
The Fire of Charity
Yet even in these
circumstances, the Church grew. In fact, amid
simultaneous persecutions and epidemics, the
Church grew still more dramatically, especially
in proportion to the total population of the
empire. Everywhere people were dropping like
flies, but the Church was growing.
How did that happen? Look
at what ordinarily happened when an epidemic
hit your hometown. The first people to leave
were usually the doctors. They knew what was
coming, and they knew they could do little to
prevent it. The second-century pagan physician
Galen admits that he fled, in his description
of the worldwide epidemic during the reign of
Marcus Aurelius. The next ones to leave were
the pagan priests, because they had the means
and the freedom to do so.
Ordinary pagan families
were encouraged to abandon their homes when
family members contracted the plague. Again,
they knew no other way to isolate the disease
than to leave the afflicted family member
behind to die, perhaps slowly.
Yet Christians were
duty-bound not to abandon the sick. Jesus
himself had said that, in caring for the sick,
Christians were caring for him. So, even
though Christians knew no more about medicine
than the pagans did, they stayed with their
family members, friends, and neighbors who
were suffering. Consider this account of the
great epidemic of the year 260, left to us by
Bishop Dionysius of Alexandria:
Most of our
brother Christians showed unbounded love and
loyalty, never sparing themselves and thinking
only of one another. Heedless of danger, they
took charge of the sick, attending their every
need and ministering to them in Christ – and
with them departed this life serenely happy;
for they were infected by others with the
disease, drawing on themselves the sickness of
their neighbors and cheerfully accepting their
pains. . . . Death in this form, the result of
great piety and strong faith, seems in every
way the equal of martyrdom.”
We also possess pagan
accounts of that epidemic, and all of them are
characterized by despair. Yet the Christians
were “serenely happy.” Nor was this an
extraordinary event. Stark says that Syrian
Antioch, considered the second city of the
empire, experienced 41 natural and social
catastrophes of this order during the years when
Christianity was on the rise. That is an average
of one cataclysmic disaster every fifteen years.
Christianity had the same
effect in other ways, as Stark noted. It
offered cities filled with strangers, orphans,
widows, the homeless, and the poor a new
family and community and a new way of life
that freed them from many of the fears that
tortured their pagan neighbors.
Amid all that havoc,
Christian charity, which usually began in the
home, brought church growth. Christians were
much more likely to survive epidemics because
they cared for one another. Mere comfort care
cut the Christians’ mortality rate by
two-thirds when compared with the pagans’.
What is more, the Christian families cared for
their pagan neighbors as well. Thus, the
pagans who received Christian care were more
likely to survive and, in turn, to become
Christians themselves. Thus, in times of
epidemic, when populations as a whole
plummeted, church growth soared.
The Spreading Flame
The pagans tended only to
take care of those in their group. While
pagans would only help their brothers,
Christians treated all men as their brothers.
And the pagans took notice. The wicked emperor
Julian, who despised all Christians and led
the charge to re-paganize the empire, still
had to grudgingly admire their charity: “The
impious Galileans support not only their poor,
but ours as well. Everyone can see that our
poor lack aid from us.”
I cannot emphasize enough
that this charitable activity was not so much
the work of institutions as of families. The
family was then, as it is now, the fundamental
unit of the Church. Until the third century,
most Christians did not have a building they
could call their “church.” Their Christian
life was centered in their homes.
Institutionalized charitable organizations
were still years away in the future, to be
established during more peaceful times.
In the beginning, charity
was, rather, the way of Christian family life.
This routine of charity did not so much
constitute a new culture, replacing the old,
at least externally. Outwardly, little had
changed in the neighborhoods inhabited by
Christians. The law, the government, the
routines of daily life remained as they were –
and as they would largely remain, intact, even
after Constantine. But inwardly, everything
had changed.
We see the means of this
transformation, even very early in Christian
history. A document of the early second
century, the anonymous Letter to Diognetus,
describes the process in profound yet simple
terms. The writer points out that Christians
are not distinguished from other people by
anything external: not their country or
language, not their food or clothing, but by
what he calls the Christians’ “wonderful and
striking way of life.”
They marry, as
do all [others]; they beget children; but they
do not commit infanticide. They have a common
table, but not a common bed. . . . They obey
the prescribed laws, and at the same time
surpass the laws by their lives. They love all
men, and are persecuted by all. They are
unknown and condemned; they are put to death,
and restored to life. . . . To sum it up: As
the soul is in the body, so Christians are in
the world. The soul is dispersed through all
the members of the body, and Christians are
scattered through all the cities of the world.
. . . The invisible soul is guarded by the
visible body, and Christians are known indeed
to be in the world, but their godliness
remains invisible.
Gradually. Invisibly. But
inexorably. This is the way that Christian
doctrine, hope, and charity transformed the
Roman Empire – one person at a time.
Christianity transformed the way neighbors
treated the sick, the way parents treated their
children, and the way husbands and wives made
love.
That is what really
happened to the Roman Empire. The gospel of
Jesus Christ gradually spread, from person to
person, from family to family, from home to
home, from neighborhood to neighborhood, then
to entire provinces. Conversion took place in
the smallest increments, one by one, because
of homes.
The Domestic Church
When we read about our
ancestors in the faith, their deeds cry out
for modern imitation. I will be so bold as to
draw out six lessons the ancient Christian
families can teach modern families.
1. Come to see your home
as a domestic church. Modern Christians tend
to think of their parish buildings as “the
church.” We have to believe that our families
are the church, that our homes are the church,
and that the kingdom of God begins in the
place we hang our hats and eat our meals. We
need to imitate the early Christians in seeing
our homes as places of worship and fellowship,
as sources of charity, and as schools of
virtue.
St. Augustine once
addressed a gathering of fathers as “my dear
fellow bishops.” That is the role that parents
play in the domestic church.
2. Make your domestic
church a haven of charity. One of the most
striking descriptions of the early Church
comes from Tertullian, who wrote: “It is our
care of the helpless, our practice of loving
kindness that brands us in the eyes of many of
our opponents, who say, ‘See those Christians,
how they love one another.’” This love has to
begin at home. It has to begin in the domestic
church.
How many of those who
decry the lack of reverence in their churches
then go home to desecrate their domestic
churches by harsh words toward their children
or toward their spouses or by gossip about
their neighbors or their co-workers? We will
all be called to account for this. Remember
the words of Tertullian. They will know we are
Christians, not by the icons on our wall, or
the fish symbols on our bumper stickers, or
the grotto in our front yard, or by our WWJD
bracelets, but by the love in our hearts,
expressed in our homes.
3. Make your domestic
church a place of prayer. This does not mean
that your day has to be dominated by
devotions, but you should have some regular,
routine family disciplines of prayer. The
early Christians saw this as necessary and so
observed “stational hours” of prayer
throughout the day – and even throughout the
night. In the third century, Tertullian
described Christian families in North Africa
rising in the middle of every night to pray
together.
Most Christians today do
not rise at 3 a.m., and I am not suggesting we
should. There are many ways to pray as a
family, and you should seek out the ways that
work best for your tribe. You can pray
together at the beginning of the day or at the
end of the day. You should pray together, at
least, by offering grace at every meal. You
can begin a weekly family Bible study. You can
join in the weekday worship your parish church
offers. The important thing is to do
something, start somewhere. Begin with
something small and manageable, and then give
yourself time to grow into it.
Apostles of Charity
4. Know that, as a
domestic church, you are “on mission.” Like
the universal Church, you are sent by Christ
to bring the gospel to the world. You are sent
outward from your home. “Sent” is the root
meaning of the word apostolate, and you and I
and all our children are called to share in
the Church’s apostolate, to be apostles to the
world.
Imagine yourself as one
of those invisible Christians living in the
ancient cities that were rotting with
epidemics. What would you do? What would you
have your family do? Would you flee the city
while your neighbors died? Would you board up
the windows and position your shotgun? You
would do as your ancestors did and go out and
serve your neighbors.
Nowadays, we can cure
many of the ancient plagues. But we should all
ask ourselves: What epidemics are consuming
the families in our neighborhoods today? What
is it that’s tearing the neighbor families
apart? What is it that leaves them scarred and
barely able to go on in life? How about
divorce? Illegitimacy? Abandonment . . . that
constant sense that they are not wanted by
someone they dearly love? Perhaps we need to
expand our definitions of poverty and
epidemic, in order to see the people our
families must serve today. There are probably
people on your block who are very lonely,
elderly and alone, or mourning, or otherwise
in need.
How might your family
help? Sometimes helping is as simple as making
meals, opening the door to your home, even
sharing your children’s “artwork” for the
neighbors’ refrigerators. It does not have to
be a lavish program. But this sort of charity
should be an ongoing family project.
Christians sometimes go overboard in shielding
their family from strangers and from
nonbelievers. But as Mother Teresa of Calcutta
said, Christ will sometimes come to us in
these distressing disguises. We have to open
wide the doors to Christ. That is part of what
it means for us to be on mission.
One of the great Fathers of
the Western Church, St. Jerome, said: “The eyes
of all are turned upon you. Your house is set on
a watchtower; your life fixes for others the
limits of their self-control.” But our lives
cannot set limits for others unless we open our
lives and our homes to others – and unless (see
lessons two and three) we live as if our house
was set on a watchtower.
Luminous Grace
5. Cultivate the virtue of
hope. Divine grace has unlimited power. It can
transform persons; it can and has transformed
cultures. As parents, as parishioners, and as
neighbors, we have to believe in miracles. We
have to believe that people can change. It is
too easy for us to believe that many people
are hopelessly lost, have been by the culture
or their own lives irremediably inoculated
against the gospel. But this is simply not
true. Read the agnostic Rodney Stark: Miracles
do happen, people do change, towns and cities
and nations can convert to Christianity at the
rate of 40 percent per decade.
6. Live by the teachings
of the Church. We need to raise our homes up
to the standards of Jesus Christ and his
Church. It is a high standard, but the
alternatives today are deadly. The early
Christians did not convert the empire by
compromising with the empire’s ideas of family
life. They did not compromise on divorce,
contraception, abortion, infanticide, or
homosexual activity.
The early Christians
hated these sins, even as they passionately
loved the sinners who committed these sins –
the sinners who lived in their neighborhoods.
We, too, need to hate these sins and keep them
far from our own homes. But we need also to
help other homes, other families to live
according to Jesus’ teachings. We need to
evangelize the families who need us. If we do
not, then we can count ourselves with the
priest and the Levite in the parable of the
Good Samaritan, who passed by the man in the
ditch.
I close not with a quote
from the early Christians but from a
contemporary Christian, Pope John Paul II, who
in On the Laity (Christifideles
Laici) drew a lesson from the early
Church as he instructed families in the ways
of evangelization:
Animated in its
own inner life by missionary zeal, the Church
of the home is also called to be a luminous
sign of the presence of Christ and of his love
for those who are “far away,” for families who
do not yet believe, and for those Christian
families who no longer live in accordance with
the faith that they once received. The
Christian family is called to enlighten “by
its example and its witness . . . those who
seek the truth.”
This
article
was originally published in Touchstone: A Journal of Mere
Christianity, May
2004. Touchstone is a
monthly ecumenical journal which
endeavors to promote doctrinal,
moral, and devotional orthodoxy
among Roman Catholics,
Protestants, and Orthodox. Copyright
© 2004 the Fellowship of St.
James. Used with permission.
Mike Aquilina is a
popular author working in the area
of Church history, especially
patristics, the study of the early
Church Fathers. He is executive
vice-president and trustee of the
St. Paul Center for Biblical
Theology, a Roman Catholic
research center based in
Steubenville, Ohio.He and his
wife, Terri, have been married
since 1985. They have six
children, who are the subject of
his book Love in the Little
Things, and two
grandchildren.
|